Meme or and um.
Just a little stepping back on the previous post of mine. First: it is always in the words that you find what you Google. Second: then they must still be filtered.
[ 8-20-07 * * * SEE PREVIOUS WARNING: CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * * Wake Up America * * * ] caught my interest, and hit some spots that were familiar and where I often go.
The particular page on Rove and Hillary along with the new filter as I note above, Meme or and um , spells it all out. But I still have a ways to go, and it is not that clear where it is coming from. All I can say is that it is a filter. What it fertilizes is still up to the "hard work" of the people. Which is something I need to get back to... later.
[Heck: Oh and I did not even read the reference to language [8-20-07 * * * CLICK AT OWN RISK (in comments to Wake Up America) * * * ]
and ended mine on vocabulary,
but "there I go again". [[11:08 AM Re: Bill Clinton as a cuss word versus Cheney a pardon for such, is just a hint at a difference in perspectives, which I had missed earlier. "Pardon my Cheney" as in "Pardon my French."]]
Here I will preemptively hit the nail on the head.
Mother Jones, you see hints at the point in the title. Alleged White House-Petraeus Arm Wrestling Over September Report a Ruse? At least that is my point. And TYT. From other source or my general filtering, Patraeus is dancing around "the turd blossoms" of information and politics. Now I will read the report.-
Now that I have, it comports with my opinion and the facts. One thing that must be remembered, there is no obligation to tell the truth to anyone in the media. Even the media has the right to lie. And apparently in this case there may be two stories ** both in public and behind closed doors. And this goes directly back to troop involvement with the facts and whether their opinions matter, whether they are in or out of the military.]
[10:37 AM - My initial impression needs to be filtered, as now I see that Wake Up America has a perspective that still needs more sorting...]
** This is already being denied.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query pardon my cheney. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query pardon my cheney. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
They started it.
See same link... I say they started it. Two realities? Rumsfeld himself said facts change as noted here before I started providing links. You can check the archives around the time you think he may have said that. Reason enough for flip-flop. But a second reason as Cheney hit it, is mutual, sort of. Since they don't do nuance everything they can't understand has flip-flop potential. They do do French as in "pardon my French" as Cheney has been caught on a podium and the senate floor referring to a journalist and later a Senator.
Well if nuance is French, then pardon my Cheney. You would think that English is Greek to them but I won't go there. No I am not being vulgar just over my head academically.
Well if nuance is French, then pardon my Cheney. You would think that English is Greek to them but I won't go there. No I am not being vulgar just over my head academically.
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
FRANKNESS: SERVING US ALL? Right.
Contribution to a new level of discourse or d’Nile. (Sent to local paper, 6-29-04, Unedited, aside from the appropriate changes in connection with the additions in italics.)
Maureen Dowd sure hit the nail on the head in "Is Cheney losing it?" and I would like to tack on a few of my own. Aside from wondering if Cheney ever really had it, as the media should know he was not one for mincing words during the campaign. The candidate Bush even concurred with his ticket-mate’s aphorism for a member of the press. That is the irony that un-minced words should get out of this administration.
After all, the president did call for Hollywood to come up with some scenarios and solutions after 9-11. He just didn’t know, read or remember the works of the creative thinkers in his administration from the neo-con philosophers to the Secretary of Infotainment Rumsfeld who said "facts change". And for the obtuse I am not equating defense with entertainment, but only in regards to his dissemination of information duties. Then there are the history "rewriters" which they eschew but now employ memo rewriters before it is determined who read or followed them or how they fit in the chain of command. From the Cheney Energy Panel or rather the "X-Files" motto that "the truth is out there" to the "Twilight Zone’s" episode "To Serve Man", Cheney has now contributed to the language of unity, not to mention great debates.
And thanks to Maureen Dowd we should remember a useful "F" word (or few words)and when disturbed cry "FOX NEWS". Then we can finally let the French off the hook. Now those who are embarrassed after a personal faux pas or outburst can just say, "Pardon my Cheney". However, for those who are proud of their verbal and debating skills, it is just about time someone let the facts slip.
I don’t know if that means we found the leak in the ship of fools or the paddle that got us up the creek. But we can probably agree it is not all down hill from here. We just may not agree on the continual trickle or flood of denial.
[4-1-08: Is Cheney Losing It? link added ]
Maureen Dowd sure hit the nail on the head in "Is Cheney losing it?" and I would like to tack on a few of my own. Aside from wondering if Cheney ever really had it, as the media should know he was not one for mincing words during the campaign. The candidate Bush even concurred with his ticket-mate’s aphorism for a member of the press. That is the irony that un-minced words should get out of this administration.
After all, the president did call for Hollywood to come up with some scenarios and solutions after 9-11. He just didn’t know, read or remember the works of the creative thinkers in his administration from the neo-con philosophers to the Secretary of Infotainment Rumsfeld who said "facts change". And for the obtuse I am not equating defense with entertainment, but only in regards to his dissemination of information duties. Then there are the history "rewriters" which they eschew but now employ memo rewriters before it is determined who read or followed them or how they fit in the chain of command. From the Cheney Energy Panel or rather the "X-Files" motto that "the truth is out there" to the "Twilight Zone’s" episode "To Serve Man", Cheney has now contributed to the language of unity, not to mention great debates.
And thanks to Maureen Dowd we should remember a useful "F" word (or few words)and when disturbed cry "FOX NEWS". Then we can finally let the French off the hook. Now those who are embarrassed after a personal faux pas or outburst can just say, "Pardon my Cheney". However, for those who are proud of their verbal and debating skills, it is just about time someone let the facts slip.
I don’t know if that means we found the leak in the ship of fools or the paddle that got us up the creek. But we can probably agree it is not all down hill from here. We just may not agree on the continual trickle or flood of denial.
[4-1-08: Is Cheney Losing It? link added ]
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
au contraire
Pardon my Cheney...(name calling and deleteds aside) it is not the "loonies" but the dis-enthused and profits of train wrecks* who may cost the Democrats.
[Post post con tent, i.e just in from my Inbox]
BTW: Cheney does not deserve a pardon, but my French does not need one.
* Barbara Walter's term for what sells or gets covered
[Post post con tent, i.e just in from my Inbox]
BTW: Cheney does not deserve a pardon, but my French does not need one.
* Barbara Walter's term for what sells or gets covered
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Pardon My Cheney[!]
Are they* going Dutch?
My inference is in the pan, not the beef.
Who pays for the good of the order?
*1. First Thoughts: State Dinner Serves Apologetic Undertones
2. Reaganomics and Joe the Plumber
3.Change in the Age of Schism[!], 4., 5., 6. Bully Pulpit Not for Pitbulls
4(a/k) .(b.Pre-Pan FRY., c. Coin-age of the day. d., e., f., g.Public Intelligence, h.Tea Kettle Sports[!], i. , j.Tetrahedron Files, k. OW )
5.(a-e) a. Fiscal Charting, c.Fear and Running, d.Recent Letters., e. BINGO!
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
Clearwater muddy.
I do not know if this is the tipping point, but the gloves are certainly off, and it has only just begun.
One thing that must be kept in mind is that not only must the political fight be carried forward but the job still must be done by those already there.
The "fudging" or lack of clarity that Bush needs is the point, and the "fudging" that the country is getting must be stopped. Pardon my "Cheney", meaning the "French" they use, but not the "heckuva job" that has been done.
But to the point, see CCR-NY.org or as I like to think:
Credence Clearwater Revolution- No Yoke Dot Org.
The Center for Constitutional Rights in New York is concerned that: now this is my spin but like the legislators in Germany held responsible for war crimes, that Congress should be careful in the clarity it provides.
Above and beyond the far fetched possibility that we would face any justice on the world stage, or rather below and deeper is the Constitution itself: Habeus corpus, warrantless spying and torture must be prevented or the terrorists will be the least of our problems.
One thing that must be kept in mind is that not only must the political fight be carried forward but the job still must be done by those already there.
The "fudging" or lack of clarity that Bush needs is the point, and the "fudging" that the country is getting must be stopped. Pardon my "Cheney", meaning the "French" they use, but not the "heckuva job" that has been done.
But to the point, see CCR-NY.org or as I like to think:
Credence Clearwater Revolution- No Yoke Dot Org.
The Center for Constitutional Rights in New York is concerned that: now this is my spin but like the legislators in Germany held responsible for war crimes, that Congress should be careful in the clarity it provides.
Above and beyond the far fetched possibility that we would face any justice on the world stage, or rather below and deeper is the Constitution itself: Habeus corpus, warrantless spying and torture must be prevented or the terrorists will be the least of our problems.
Monday, June 07, 2010
Freakin'
Couched In Spin.
Pardon my Cheney * and I restrict the freak reference to the emotive not physically different(though mentally challenged). In all gravity there is some sense to the slippery slope when communications is involved, and it could be that we continually appropriate words and others fly or run them down**, depending on whether the basket has a balloon or a wheel.]
* (continued from) [Going to)Heck in a Hand Basket? Sofa(couched)King in Freakin' Cultural Spin.]
** earlier usage is heaven in a handbasket or head in a handbasket, or is it to keep up with the Jones? Note: I did not actually read all these sources completely, but enough to see that is seems that "heaven in a handbasket" is not yet really sourced, and possibly enough to note that a handbasket carried donations presumably to get one to heaven, while a wheelbarrow implies taking it with one. It also implies that a basket is swifter than a wheelbarrow and something about directions and works.
Pardon my Cheney * and I restrict the freak reference to the emotive not physically different(though mentally challenged). In all gravity there is some sense to the slippery slope when communications is involved, and it could be that we continually appropriate words and others fly or run them down**, depending on whether the basket has a balloon or a wheel.]
* (continued from) [Going to)Heck in a Hand Basket? Sofa(couched)King in Freakin' Cultural Spin.]
** earlier usage is heaven in a handbasket or head in a handbasket, or is it to keep up with the Jones? Note: I did not actually read all these sources completely, but enough to see that is seems that "heaven in a handbasket" is not yet really sourced, and possibly enough to note that a handbasket carried donations presumably to get one to heaven, while a wheelbarrow implies taking it with one. It also implies that a basket is swifter than a wheelbarrow and something about directions and works.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Conservative Foray (4A)
The right wing rhetoric suffers
from four faults or defaults:
Anecdotal
Apocryphal
Anachronistic
Academic[*]
In particular:
Lew Rockwell
Anne Wortham
Betsy McGaughey
Floy Lilley **
I did not select these, they were being spread by a victim of the victim hoods.
[* This 4A was held in draft, and pondered till I arrived at the right Initialism. Speaking of design and initialism the origin was:
often A$$ Backward Oops!! - Pardon my Cheney , I meant acronym-ism.]
**[Hopefully I have these in descending order.]
[(CTTC)Cutting through the Cr@p:
I would love for economists to cut through some of this.]
[Academic is a word like politician and lawyer that have developed a poor reputation, not to mention rhetoric and Swift Boaters. Or Bottom Line? ]
[(CTTC2.0)I have two bold links above that I would like economists to examine, in particular in light of the bad rap Keynesian economics keeps taking. In that regard, on a lighter and less silly or harsh note; Greenspan seems to be learning, or has he, and in regards to the Floy piece and the bottom line;
is there not some synergy that needs to be worked out? Meaning current efforts cannot be compared to past efforts directly, while problems that are missed will be the devil in the detail. The Carbon Market may be a solution, but not if the Market period is the problem. In other words, I have not looked too deeply into the hot air side (climate matters) of the equation, but feel that the thin air problem (financial matters)is deeper. To re-embed in aphorism, there is bang for your buck and there is the value of your bang. And there is likely more that matters.
from four faults or defaults:
Anecdotal
Apocryphal
Anachronistic
Academic[*]
In particular:
Lew Rockwell
Anne Wortham
Betsy McGaughey
Floy Lilley **
I did not select these, they were being spread by a victim of the victim hoods.
[* This 4A was held in draft, and pondered till I arrived at the right Initialism. Speaking of design and initialism the origin was:
often A$$ Backward Oops!! - Pardon my Cheney , I meant acronym-ism.]
**[Hopefully I have these in descending order.]
[(CTTC)Cutting through the Cr@p:
I would love for economists to cut through some of this.]
[Academic is a word like politician and lawyer that have developed a poor reputation, not to mention rhetoric and Swift Boaters. Or Bottom Line? ]
[(CTTC2.0)I have two bold links above that I would like economists to examine, in particular in light of the bad rap Keynesian economics keeps taking. In that regard, on a lighter and less silly or harsh note; Greenspan seems to be learning, or has he, and in regards to the Floy piece and the bottom line;
is there not some synergy that needs to be worked out? Meaning current efforts cannot be compared to past efforts directly, while problems that are missed will be the devil in the detail. The Carbon Market may be a solution, but not if the Market period is the problem. In other words, I have not looked too deeply into the hot air side (climate matters) of the equation, but feel that the thin air problem (financial matters)is deeper. To re-embed in aphorism, there is bang for your buck and there is the value of your bang. And there is likely more that matters.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Not to be full of it...
or demonstrate I Ron Knee...
but everything must be taken in context.
In fact, WMD is an example and Weapon of Mass Distraction, Akin to E.D (entitlement distraction).
Hume or ... is an example of empiricism, and empire is not so in context.
Pardon my tan gent, but not my French* or Cheney, let alone Rumsfeld.
*link inserted 3-28-14 and is technically an anti-thesis.
but everything must be taken in context.
In fact, WMD is an example and Weapon of Mass Distraction, Akin to E.D (entitlement distraction).
Hume or ... is an example of empiricism, and empire is not so in context.
Pardon my tan gent, but not my French* or Cheney, let alone Rumsfeld.
*link inserted 3-28-14 and is technically an anti-thesis.
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
Preemptive Comment
Only slightly: Pardon Cheney, he doesn't know what the "legal definition" of anything is. Pardon me, Chris Matthews, we need a new word for "beyond hypothetical". He asked a guest what they would be saying if Bush has just given the same speech. Since Ron Reagan was one the guests, it might have made sense if the other guest had been a Republican but maybe not. My point? This is not a speech that Bush could have given or ever would have given, no matter how similar one thinks it sounds. At least not on Cheney's watch.[**]
Speech - TEXT
CNN video
Biden support
Republicans agree. (OK this is a tangent, but I earlier thought that Cheney is getting too much coverage. If his comments would be filtered to what was really news and reasonably accurate, he would get none.)
MSNBC - General Eaton - Steve Clemons - Cenk Uygur * - Howard Fineman - Hardball - Rachel Maddow - also - Olbermann - Maxine Waters - Kucinich - Ed Schultz - Pragmatic
* I am in Karen Finney's corner
[**] 12-1-09 update: which gives short shrift to Bush's natural proclivities.
Speech - TEXT
CNN video
Biden support
Republicans agree. (OK this is a tangent, but I earlier thought that Cheney is getting too much coverage. If his comments would be filtered to what was really news and reasonably accurate, he would get none.)
MSNBC - General Eaton - Steve Clemons - Cenk Uygur * - Howard Fineman - Hardball - Rachel Maddow - also - Olbermann - Maxine Waters - Kucinich - Ed Schultz - Pragmatic
* I am in Karen Finney's corner
[**] 12-1-09 update: which gives short shrift to Bush's natural proclivities.
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Weigh In or Way Out?
This is just to note that I have not weighed in on Cheney's Putter, the Golf War Dis-aster(sp!). Nor might* I way out on the recent SCOTUS nomination.
* Normite(sp!) not applicable, but I have aster risked the hints...not exactly.
[We've come a long way Katy! Pardon the innuendo**, but from Oil welfare rich Alaska to VP candidate to BP and back, I mean really... ]
** seriously I allude to the three women from politician to journalist and potential jurist, but there is caveat of commity* in word play.) (Is there a commity* network?)
[No! I did not know that.] Hint: Johnny or Jay Walker?] SNL?
[update: Not exactly! Tangent or See Can't or just Penn Station?
*[5-17-10] spell check (sp?!) legend: as intended? OK! In this case, alright.
In other cases (sp!) as intended, (sp!?) maybe more than one intention?
aka: no pun intended, or was there? This is a long narrative to say I don't intend to correct the unintended misspell, as in other minds it may mean something. But my intention was to insert the caveat channel.
* Normite(sp!) not applicable, but I have aster risked the hints...not exactly.
[We've come a long way Katy! Pardon the innuendo**, but from Oil welfare rich Alaska to VP candidate to BP and back, I mean really... ]
** seriously I allude to the three women from politician to journalist and potential jurist, but there is caveat of commity* in word play.) (Is there a commity* network?)
[No! I did not know that.] Hint: Johnny or Jay Walker?] SNL?
[update: Not exactly! Tangent or See Can't or just Penn Station?
*[5-17-10] spell check (sp?!) legend: as intended? OK! In this case, alright.
In other cases (sp!) as intended, (sp!?) maybe more than one intention?
aka: no pun intended, or was there? This is a long narrative to say I don't intend to correct the unintended misspell, as in other minds it may mean something. But my intention was to insert the caveat channel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)